Legal Opinion
Audette v. City of Truth or Consequences Commissioners Lori Montgomery
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 2011No. 33,321; Docket No. 30,988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} Kim Audette and Sophia Perón seek appellate review of two district court orders in an administrative appeal from the decision of a city zoning commission. Rather than filing a petition for writ of certiorari in this Court as required by the relevant statutes and Rule 12-505 NMRA, Audette and Perón filed a notice of appeal and a docketing statement. Because the docketing statement substantially complies with the content requirements of Rule 12-505(D)(2), we accept their docketing statement as a non-conforming petition. Also, because they requested an extension of time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hyden v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Executive Sports Club, Inc. v. First Plaza TrustNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- San Juan 1990-A., L.P. v. El Paso Production Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Curbello v. VaughnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Wakeland v. New Mexico Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Audette v. City of Truth or ConsequencesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Davis v. Town of TaosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018