Legal Opinion

Blomenstiel v. Tridico

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1933No. 1204PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOUTON, Judge.

Plaintiff, holder and owner of a promissory note secured by chattel mortgage on a sedan automobile, obtained the issuance of a writ of seizure and sale by executory process, under which the auto was seized by Mr. Mire, sheriff of the parish of Ascension, who advertised it to be sold on August 27, 1932, at 11 o’clock a. m.

Joseph T. Wilbert intervened by third opposition in the executory proceedings, claiming that he had a chattel mortgage on the seized auto for $300 with interest and attorney’s fees, which primed that of the plaintiff, seizing creditor; and prayed that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stackhouse v. ZuntzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. Sevey v. Chappuis Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riffel v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API