Barry Ball v. Greg Grams
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Wisconsin prisoner Barry Ball petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he was deprived of good-time credits in violation of his due-process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court found that the prison authorities acted properly and denied Ball’s petition. We affirm.
Prison officials at Oshkosh Correctional Institution issued Ball a conduct report that charged him with sexual conduct and battery in violation of the Wisconsin prison code. See Wis. Admin. Code §§ DOC 303.12, 303.15. The report concluded, based on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Larry Whitford v. Captain BoglinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Phil White v. Indiana Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Austin v. SpillerDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
- GAINES v. PRETORIUSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2025