Legal Opinion

United States v. One Reo Sedan

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 27, 1930No. 4091PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

These are proceedings on information to forfeit under 19 USCA §§ 482 and 483 (Rev. St. §§ 3061, 3062), a Reo sedan whieh had been used by one James F. McDonough in the transportation of intoxicating liquors, claimed to have been illegally imported into the United States. The matter is presented upon the claim of the C. I. T. Corporation, the holder of a conditional contract of sale whieh, by reason of defaults on the part of McDonough, the conditional vendee, entitled the corporation to the immediate possession of the ear. Trial by jury was duly waived.

The evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. 1960 Bags of CoffeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1814

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Pacific Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Picou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. The Evelyn RuthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
  4. United States v. One Oldsmobile SedanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1938
  5. Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API