Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Knapton

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1978No. 78-212Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover balances due under the terms of two promissory notes. The defendant entered a pro se appearance and at all times, before appeal, represented himself.

The plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and, more than thirty days later, the defendant answered by an unsworn pleading entitled “Defendant’s Answer to Pending Plea of Assumpsit and Motion for Summary Judgment.” See RSA 491:8-a (Supp. 1977). The plaintiff then filed (and served on the defendant by certified mail return receipt requested) requests for admissions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. BartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Coburn v. First Equity Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API