Legal Opinion

Routt v. Ready

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 5, 1920No. 3301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Action by Randolph Routt, by E. Roy Routt, his next friend, against Michael J. Ready. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Action in tort for damages against defendant, Michael J. Ready, a practicing physician and surgeon, for malpractice in the treatment of plaintiff, Randolph Routt, an infant. Erom a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

The two counts of the declaration on which the case was tried charged defendant with failure to make proper diagnosis and with lack of skill, care, and attention in treating plaintiff’s ailment. Plaintiff’s ailment consisted of osteomyelitis of the bone of the leg. After a preliminary operation, defendant recommended a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. HollandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Littlejohn v. ArbogastAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Potter v. WarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Nelson v. McCrearyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API