Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Ponca City Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1918No. 9499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from State Industrial Oomnxission. Claim for compensation by Frank Flynn against the Ponca City Milling Company and the Millers’ Mutual Casualty Company. From an award of the Industrial Commission; in favor of the claimant, the companies appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

This is an appeal from an award made toy the Industrial Commission in favor of the claimant, Frank Flynn.

Flynn claimed to have been injured toy a flour truck striking him in the side, which resulted in the formation of an abscess on the side of his chest..The principal question at issue at the hearing was whether this abscess was the result of the accident. Without notice to cither party, a transcript of the testimony was submitted to the medical adviser of the commission, who gave his written opinion to the effect that the abscess probably resulted from the injury. On this opinion the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Englebretson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. KnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Ranney Rig Bldg. Co. v. GivensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Francis Vitric Brick Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API