State Ex Rel. Marberry v. MacHt
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 36. (concurring). I understand and share the reticence of Justice Sykes' lead opinion for the remedy of release. Marberry continues to suffer from a mental illness which makes it substantially probable that he will engage in acts of sexual violence if not continued in institutional care. Release at this time would unduly endanger the public.
¶ 37. Nevertheless, I disagree with the proffered remedies of the lead opinion!1 They are inadequate and unworkable. Perhaps most problematic, however, is that the lead opinion's remedies are misdirected. Rather than put the onus of ensuring compliance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RachelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Marberry v. MacHtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002