Legal Opinion

FIRST NAT. BANK IN KEARNEY v. Bunn

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1976No. 40343PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kortum, District Judge.

This is an action to set aside a conveyance of real estate made between the defendants as husband and wife.

The defendants Marlene M. Bunn and Charles F. Bunn, husband and wife, purchased a home in Kearney, Nebraska, on August 15, 1971. The downpayment of approximately $11,000 was borrowed on a short-term note which was a short time later paid by proceeds from a sale of separate property owned by the defendant Marlene M. Bunn. The balance of the purchase price was secured by a mortgage executed by both the defendants and the property was titled jointly in the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington v. DrakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Farmers Elevator Co. v. PeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Jayne v. HymerNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Big Horn Collieries Co. v. RolandNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Slosburg v. HunterNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States Nat. Bank of Omaha v. RupeNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gifford-Hill & Co., Inc. v. StollerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Meier v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICESNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cain v. Custer Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Jean A. Stanko v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API