Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Oriskany Central School District & Edmund J. Booth Architects, A.I.A.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On June 1, 1984, plaintiff and defendant architect entered into a contract in which defendant agreed to perform architectural services in connection with the reroofing of the Oriskany Central High School and the Oriskany Elementary School. Article 9 of the contract provided for the arbitration of any disputes within a reasonable time after a dispute arose and with the proviso that no demand for the arbitration of a dispute could be made "after the date when institution of legal or equitable…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bem I, L.L.C. v. Anthropologie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Brisbane Lodging, L.P. v. Webcor Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Harbor Court Associates v. Leo A. Daly Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Matter of Oriskany Cent. Sch. Dist.New York Court of Appeals · 1995