Legal Opinion
Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. Wolf
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 4, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously reversed without costs, motion to dismiss granted, and complaint dismissed.
In this consumer credit transaction, plaintiff seeks the sum of $2,288.97, plus attorney’s fees, for defendant’s failure to return a leased vehicle in the condition required under the lease agreement, to wit, excess mileage.
Prior to answering the complaint, defendant moved to dismiss because “the summons and complaint are jurisdiction-ally defective in that they fail to include the address of the plaintiff.” Based upon this omission, defendant maintained that there were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- M. Katz & Son Billiard Products, Inc. v. G. Correale & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Success Marketing Electronics, Inc. v. Titan Security, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Croce v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSuffolk County District Court · 2011