Legal Opinion
B & J Manufacturing Company v. Solar Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1973No. 73-1022PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Solar Industries, Inc., sought a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that a patent owned by the defendant for a “tire bead seater” was invalid and/or was not infringed by the plaintiff. Service of process on the defendant was obtained pursuant to Minnesota’s “long-arm” statutes, M.S.A. §§ 303.13 1 and 543.19, 2 as permitted by Rule 4(e), Fed. R.Civ.P. The defendant, appearing specially, moved to dismiss the action or, alternatively, to quash the return of service on the ground, inter alia, that the court was without personal jurisdiction over the defendant. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Land-O-Nod Company v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated, and the E.B. Malone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- William A. Hahn v. Vermont Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Nova Biomedical Corporation v. Willi Moller, D/b/a/ Gebruder Moller GlasblasereiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Cascade Corporation v. Hiab-Foco Ab, a Swedish CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.