Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southern Colonization Co. v. Howard Cole & Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1925Published

1DissentOwen, J.

A narrow and technical construction of a statute has been indulged' to work a result that is in striking contrast with recent legislative and judicial policy to broaden and rationalize procedure to the end that a consideration of the merits of the case shall not be delayed out of regard for technical considerations. I have no fault to find with the general definition of the term “trial” contained in the opinion. I do feel, however, that the application of that general definition to the term “new trial” in sub. (3) of sec. 3069, Stats., is utterly inconsistent with apparent legislative purpose…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilroy v. BadgerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  2. State v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Walters v. EakinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Taft v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Taft v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API