Legal Opinion

Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 10, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before us by way of appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal. By separate order we have denied that motion. .We have accelerated the appeal for purposes of argument and disposition because it involves an election matter. See R. 1:2—5(1).

On our own motion we summarily affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Serpentelli in *12his written opinion of June 4, 1987, reported at 219 N.J.Super. 231 (Law Div.1987). See R. 2:8-3(b).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. GhigliottyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shalita v. Township of WashingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. State v. HurtadoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Brubaker v. Ship Bottom Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  4. Patterson v. CooperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Booker v. RiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API