Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Per curiam
This matter comes before us by way of appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal. By separate order we have denied that motion. .We have accelerated the appeal for purposes of argument and disposition because it involves an election matter. See R. 1:2—5(1).
On our own motion we summarily affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Serpentelli in *12his written opinion of June 4, 1987, reported at 219 N.J.Super. 231 (Law Div.1987). See R. 2:8-3(b).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. GhigliottyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shalita v. Township of WashingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- State v. HurtadoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Brubaker v. Ship Bottom Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Patterson v. CooperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Booker v. RiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.