State v. Johnson

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in consolidating the cases against him and those *168against Johnson for trial. The assignment has no merit. The question of consolidation was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, 2 N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 92, and no abuse of discretion has been shown.

By his second assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in denying his motions for nonsuit. This assignment is without merit. Evidence presented by the State is summarized in pertinent part as follows:

On 6 December 1974, Mrs.…