Culpepper v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
In the view which we take of this ease, misnomer *800of Ed C. Culpepper is not involved. Misnomer is a mistake in a name, the giving of an incorrect name to a person in an accusation, indictment, pleading, or other instrument. 40 C. J. 1224. Culpepper was not named by misnomer in this accusation. The defect in the accusation is that it did not name Culpepper as the perpetrator of -the crime in the charging pa-rt thereof or elsewhere therein, by a misnomer or otherwise. The trouble is that it designated a distinct and separate person as the perpetrator of the offense. The surname of the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BlanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. ValsinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McCormick v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
- Noeske v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- City of Cleveland v. Technisort, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Commonwealth v. Brown Forman Distillers Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- State v. RudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.