In re Natalie T.

*698In two child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from so much of an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Beckoff, J.), dated December 14, 2011, as, after a hearing, found that he neglected the subject children.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

To establish neglect, the petitioner must demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, (1) that the child’s physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming…