Legal Opinion

In Re Epogen & Aranesp Off-Label Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 8, 2008No. MDL 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel * : Plaintiff in an action pending in the Northern District of Illinois has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in that district. This litigation currently consists of five actions listed on Schedule A and pending in the Central District of California, the Northern District of Illinois, the Eastern District of Michigan, the District of New Jersey, and the Middle District of Pennsylvania, respectively.

Plaintiffs in the Middle District of Pennsylvania and District of New Jersey actions support the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Cygnus Telecommunications Technology Patent Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API