Legal Opinion

King v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1925No. 4595Published

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

H. M. King Jr. and Alma W. King, husband and wife> executed a promissory note as joint makers, indorsed by H. W. Krauss, payable to J. Hunter Hopkins, for'thé sum of $750, due three months after date. In evidence submitted for the plaintiff was a written instrument executed by Mrs. King and presented to the payee of the note, reciting as follows:

“Mr. J. Hunter Hopkins, Brunswick, Ga.
“Dear Sir:—I have today given you note for $750.00, due in three months, signed by myself and H. M. King Jr., as makers. Please accept this writing as a statement from me that I am making this loan for my own…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hopkins v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API