Huff v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1DissentCobb, Judge
The majority reversed the judgment and remanded this case based upon the appellant’s contention that he was denied his Sixth Amendment Right to confront witnesses against him and his right to a fair trial. If the appellant had not withdrawn his motion for a mistrial, I would have readily agreed with the majority. However, at the close of the State’s case, the State’s attorney asked the appellant directly if he would like a mistrial. The district attorney then stated for the record that the State was not opposed to the court’s declaring a mistrial. However, after conferring with his client,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Britain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.