Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Church
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 14, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
On or about September 15th, 1928, F. E. Kingston caused to be formed an organization known as The Kingston Associates, hereinafter called Associates, of which any employee, partner or associate of the firm of F. E. Kingston & Company could become a member by depositing $1 per week or a multiple thereof. The funds thus collected were to be invested by F. E. Kingston and he opened a margin account with F. E. Kingston & Company for that purpose, and designated E. E. Church, the defendant herein, trustee of Associates. Any member could at any time withdraw the money paid in by him and receive six…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartford Realization Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Town of West Hartford v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bridgeport Brass Workers Union v. Thomas SmithConnecticut Superior Court · 1948
- More v. Western Connecticut Title & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Chase Brass & Copper Workers Union Local 565 v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Goring v. Orlins Michaud, No. Cv-98-0547193 (Jun. 23, 1999) Ct Page 7742Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Paine Webber, Inc. v. Chapman, Moran, No. Cv 290715 (Sep. 7, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994