Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ruiz v. New Garden Township

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 26, 2004No. 02-4434Published

1ConcurrenceRosenn, Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment reversing the District Court’s decision. I write separately, however, because I cannot agree with the majority’s analysis based on an assumption that the plaintiffs have a protected property interest. I also believe due process analysis is unnecessary to the disposition of this case.

I

Where, as here, there is a claim of an alleged deprivation of property without due process, a two-part inquiry is required. Kovats v. Rutgers, 749 F.2d 1041, 1047 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom. Varna v. Bloustein, 489 U.S. 1014, 109 S.Ct. 1126, 103 L.Ed.2d 188 (1989) (citing Logan…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Grayden v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API