Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ross

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1990No. 17779PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

In this case a divorced woman seeks to modify the judgment entered in her divorce case in order to obtain an interest in her former husband’s military retirement benefits. A preliminary issue presented is whether the legislature had authority to authorize the modification of divorce judgments in order to provide relief for those women affected by the decision of the United States Supreme Court in McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210, 101 S.Ct. 2728, 69 L.Ed.2d 589 (1981). We conclude that the legislature did have the authority to do so. However, we hold that under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Ramsey v. RamseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Aldape v. AkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Srba Case No. 39576Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sword v. SweetIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Maslen v. MaslenIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Andrus v. NicholsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API