Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Cullen & Dykman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for invasion of privacy, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated September 26, 1994, which denied its motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff waived his right to assert the physician-patient privilege by affirmatively and voluntarily placing his medical condition in controversy. In addition to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Olan v. Farrell Lines Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Gaeta v. New York News Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. De Silva v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Riccardi v. Tampax, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neferis v. DeStefanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Finnegan v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API