Legal Opinion

People v. Lannon

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Duncan S. McNab, J.

The defendants herein are two patrolmen presently under suspension from the Town of Greenburgh police force. Under the above-noted indictment, they have been charged, acting in concert and while off duty, with, inter alla, burglarizing a Grand Union Supermarket and stealing some $5,000 worth of merchandise therefrom. Separate Huntley hearings were held for each defendant. This opinion, in large part, treats a novel issue that arose common to both defendants, namely, were various statements made by these police officer defendants to their superior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Pinkney v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  5. People v. LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MarchettaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  2. People v. AustinNew York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API