Legal Opinion
Switzer Bros. v. Locklin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 30, 1961No. Nos. 13193, 13194PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERCER, District Judge.
Appellants, Switzer Bros., Inc., Robert C. Switzer and Joseph L. Switzer, appeal from a judgment granting injunctive relief to appellee and ordering appellants to render an accounting on account of violation of 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2 and 14. Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, d/b/a Radiant Color Company, prosecute a cross-appeal, contending that the court below erred in failing to enjoin appellants from continuing to use the registered trademark, “Day-Glo”, in the marketing of daylight fluorescent materials.
Hereinafter, for convenience, the name Switzer, is used to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carpa, Inc. v. Ward Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. LocklinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Kolene Corporation v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1969
- 10k LLC v. Wvsv HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Carpa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants v. Ward Foods, Inc., Third-Party Appellants-Appellees v. Bill G. Martin, Third-Party Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976