Legal Opinion

Scott v. Naacke

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon. Henry Bank, Jr., Judge. An action to test the sufficiency of a statement of general consent to sell intoxicating liquors in certain towns in Lee County. Upon a trial the statement was found sufficient, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

On the 13th day of November, 1905, the appellees filed with the auditor of Lee County a statement of general consent to sell intoxicating liquors in the towns named therein. On the same day the said auditor published a notice of the filing of said petition, and that it would be canvassed by the board of supervisors on the 28th day of the same month/ On November 28 the board of supervisors began the canvass of the petition so filed, meeting and adjourning from time to time, and on the 9th day of December the board passed a resolution declaring said petition sufficient. Between the 13th of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Porter v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Green v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Wilson v. BohstedtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeBoard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Barber v. DeFordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Jackman v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Lemon v. DrexelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API