Legal Opinion

Montrym v. Panora

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 25, 1977No. Civ. A. CA 76-2560-FPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*394OPINION

Before CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge, and TAURO and FREEDMAN, District Judges. FREEDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Donald E. Montrym, brings this suit, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, challenging the constitutionality of the Massachusetts implied consent statute, M.G.L. c. 90 § 24(l)(f). That statute provides for an automatic ninety-day suspension of one’s driver’s license for refusal to take a chemical test or analysis of one’s breath after having been arrested for operating a motor vehicle on a public way while under…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montrym v. PanoraDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
  3. State v. BallardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Montrym v. PanoraDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API