Felske v. Daugherty

While I agree with the majority that the equal protection requirement of the Ohio Constitution should be the basis for our disposition in favor of the claimant, I must concur only in the judgment because I would subject a different classification to equal protection analysis (part I, infra), and because I believe that there exists herein statutory grounds for avoiding the constitutional merits of a classification which the majority in fact does subject to equal protection analysis (part II, infra).

I

Prior to January 1, 1979, a claimant could avoid the six-year jurisdictional limitation of R.…