People v. Ahuero
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice
¶ 1 This ease requires us to decide whether a trial court abuses its discretion when it denies a continuance that defense counsel requested seeking more time to prepare for trial. 1 At the time defense counsel moved for the continuance, the trial court was confronted with—and considered—the following: (1) defense counsel would have three weeks to prepare for. a two- or three-day trial involving eight witnesses and no physical evidence, but defense counsel refused to make specific arguments on why the additional time was needed; (2) the trial court would have had to rearrange its docket and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- v. PratarelliColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Peo v. PerezColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- People v. SenetteColorado Court of Appeals · 2018