Legal Opinion

Leago v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 2, 1929No. 12130Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Since the passage of the present law relative to the preparation of bills of exception and statement of facts, and the time within which same must be filed, this court has uniformly held that orders extending the time for such filing, must be made within the time allowed by statute, or within the time fixed by prior court order. Sanders v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep. 34; Armstrong v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep. 59; Samples v. State, 80 Texas Crim. Rep. 418; Parker v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep. 81; Hart v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep. 653; Fuston v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Mireles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Fuston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API