Legal Opinion

Corbett v. Wade

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1939No. 10687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

Upon consideration of this appeal, while, under the disposition determined upon, no written opinion is required, this much of the able brief for the appellee so clearly presents the view here taken that it is adopted as the expression of this court :

“This is a suit for the reasonable value of necessaries furnished the appellant’s wife.
“The appellant' is E. B. Corbett, the defendant in the trial court. The appellee is Laurine Wade, the plaintiff in the trial court. She was Mrs. E. B. Corbett’s daughter by a former marriage. The necessaries were furnished by appellee, Laurine…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hedtke v. HedtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Magee v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Dallas & Wichita R'y Co. v. SpickerTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Jordan Marsh Co. v. HedtlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Black v. BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1857

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clemens v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  2. Clemens v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  3. Corbett v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API