Legal Opinion

Watson v. Pieszak

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 31, 2006No. AC 27179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Audley K. Watson, appeals from the judgment rendered after the trial court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of sovereign immunity. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff, an inmate at a Connecticut correctional institution, commenced this declaratory judgment action against the defendants, Temmy A. Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services; Preston Tisdale, director of special public defenders; and Patrice A. Cohan,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carrubba v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Carrubba v. MoskowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Isaacs v. OttavianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mooney v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Danso v. University of ConnecticutConnecticut Superior Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API