Legal Opinion

In re Prudential Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 10, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Richard Golebiowski and Louis Romano, Prudential Insurance Company (Prudential) policyholders, bringl this derivative suit against: (1) the executives of Prudential Securities Incor*261porated (PSI), a Prudential subsidiary; (2) certain Prudential executives; (3) the Prudential Board of Directors (also “the Board” or “the director defendants”); and (4) Prudential, as a nominal defendant. Plaintiff Romano additionally sues on behalf of a class of similarly situated policyholders.

The amended consolidated complaint claims breach of fiduciary duty (Count I); waste,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Prudential Ins. Co. Litig.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API