Legal Opinion

Christmas v. Turkin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 18, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from the trial court’s granting of a partial summary judgment to the appellees, holding that the appellants Christmas had failed to exercise an option to purchase certain real property. The appellees had leased the property to the appellants. The lease contained the following paragraph:

“6. OPTION TO PURCHASE. Owner hereby grants to Tenants, during the first two (2) years of this Lease, the option to purchase the premises under the following terms and conditions:

a. Tenant may exercise the option by giving Owner written notice as provided herein…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Monahan v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Oberan v. Western MacHinery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. John R. Miller v. Lesea Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Offerman v. GranadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API