Legal Opinion

Barlas v. Johnson Electrical Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames T. Hallinan, J.

This is a motion to require defendant to serve a bill of particulars and submit to an examination before trial. Defendant opposes on the ground that the attorney who makes this motion on behalf of plaintiffs is not plaintiffs’ attorney of record.

Plaintiffs commenced this action by their attorneys Levine & Berman and defendant served an answer containing counterclaims. On June 20, 1963, by stipulation between the attorney for defendant and Levine & Berman, plaintiffs’ time to reply was extended to July 17, 1963. A reply was served on July 16, 1963 by Nathaniel Bothstein “ appearing on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TrapierNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ratner v. Lehigh Valley RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerNew York City Family Court · 1969
  2. Chemprene, Inc. v. X-Tyal International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. In re WilliamsNew York City Family Court · 1983
  4. Chemprene, Inc. v. X-Tyal International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API