Hardin v. American Guar. Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF COURT.
The following is taken, verbatim, from the opinion.
MIDDLETON. J.
It is apparent, we think, that the overruling of the motion to quash was not a judgment nor a final order such as is prescribed in 12247 and 12257 GC. It follows that this court is without jurisdiction to review the action in question of the lower court. In Arbuckle v. American Belting Co., 91 OS. 415, it is held that a judgment of the Court of Appeals under such conditions must be vacated and the action remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. In Canning Co. v. Weller, 9 Oh. Ap. 468, the facts…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Buck v. BuckOhio Court of Appeals · 1940