United States v. Standard Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, District Judge.
At the close of the testimony, motions were made on behalf of each of the defendants for a directed verdict. While the Court was of the opinion that in some cases the motions were well taken, the testimony was so voluminous, the exhibits so extensive in number, that it seemed impelling that no ruling on the motion be made until there was opportunity for a thorough study of the evidence, and a careful and deliberate consideration of the law, with the aid of arguments and briefs. The jury had been sequestered from October, 1937 to January, 1938, which included the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gebardi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Grau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940