Anderson v. Gooding
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Plaintiff contends that the notice to creditors published by E. L. Gooding, Executor of Elizabeth Gooding Hardy, did not comply with G.S. 28A-14-1, gave inadequate notice to plaintiff and was therefore ineffective to start the running of the six months’ Statute of Limitations contained in G.S. 28A-19-3(a). The Court of Appeals held to the contrary, and this constitutes plaintiff’s first assignment of error before this Court.
G.S. 28A-14-1, in effect at the time in question, read in pertinent part as follows:
“Every personal representative and collector within 20 days after the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harris v. LattaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Love v. . IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Morrisey v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Gilliam v. . WilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cash v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Topsail Reef Homeowners Ass'n v. Zurich Specialties London, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Azalea Garden Board & Care, Inc. v. VanhoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Force v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Mabry v. HuneycuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.