Legal Opinion

Green v. DeFrank

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 29, 2011No. AC 32948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The self-represented plaintiff, Gail April Green, commenced this action to dispute the attorney’s fees paid from the proceeds of her workers’ compensation award. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, Steven J. DeFrank, one of several attorneys who represented her. In ruling on the motion for summary judgment, the court issued a memorandum of decision, which is a concise and thoughtful statement of the facts and the applicable law on the issue. See Green v. DeFrank, 52 Conn. Sup. 160, 33 A.3d 899…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. WysockiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Arcano v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Green v. DeFrankConnecticut Superior Court · 2010

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nestico v. WeymanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Tuite v. Hospital of Central ConnecticutConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. General Accident Insurance v. MortaraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Harnage v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. Kloth-Zanard v. Dept. of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API