Lake v. Sealy
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
The complainant, appellant here, rests the equity of-the bill on his asserted right to have the court decree a dissolution of the partnership between himself and McCaskill, state the account between the parties, sell the assets of the partnership, and distribute the residue of the proceeds of the partnership after paying the partnership debts.
Taking the averments of the bill as true, treating defects apparent on the face of the bill as amended, as must be done in considering the general demurrer for want of equity (McDuffie et al. v. Lynchburg Shoe Co. et al., 178 Ala. 268, 59…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- McDuffie v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Federal Oil Co. v. Western Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1902
- Marrs v. City of OxfordDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1928
- Phillips v. Springfield Crude Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCall v. NettlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Caudle v. CottonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Premier Industrial Corporation v. MarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Sealy v. LakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Rehfuss v. McAndrewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.