Legal Opinion

Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. McRae

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 28, 2005No. 2040295Published

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

Bombardier Capital, Inc. (“Bombardier”), appeals from an order staying the enforcement of a monetary judgment against Sarah McRae and Nancy McRae (“the McRaes”) for as long as the McRaes continue to make installment payments of $163 per month.

In 1998, the McRaes purchased a mobile home as a residence for Nancy McRae.1 The purchase was financed by an installment sale contract (“the contract”) that was secured by the mobile home. The contract, the security interest in the mobile home, and the related financing documents were assigned to Bombardier by the dealer who sold the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. In Re Massachusetts Helicopter Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. Ex Parte OsbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc., Ely Valley Mines, Inc., and John Janney v. Helen DolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API