Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Tate

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 92-993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Res judicata precludes the filing of successive habeas corpus petitions. Hudlin v. Alexander (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 153, 586 N.E.2d 86. In this case, the record demonstrates that appellant has previously filed at least one habeas corpus action, No. 1352, in the Court of Appeals for Scioto County, in which the expiration-of-sentence claim could have been raised. Moreover, his claim that he misunderstood sentencing procedures does not challenge the jurisdiction of the sentencing court. Wireman v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 322,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudlin v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wireman v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Childs v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Childs v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API