Legal Opinion

Washington Mutual Bank v. Freitag

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 4, 2011No. 070387, 070388 A142630 (Control), A142631PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Plaintiff Washington Mutual Bank 1 filed these consolidated actions to foreclose on trust deeds to two coastal properties owned by defendants. In response, defendants asserted affirmative defenses and counterclaims based on the bank’s alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of various federal statutes. The trial court granted the bank’s motion for summary judgment as to all but one issue — a factual dispute concerning credits for hazard insurance charges that were applied to the balance on the loans; after a bench trial, the court ruled in the bank’s favor on that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Bergmann v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mauro v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  5. Jones v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Transworld Systems IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
  2. L.D. Miller Construction, Inc. v. KirschenbaumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API