Legal Opinion · Dissent

Discolo v. River Gas & Wash Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 2007Published

1Dissent

Saxe, J.P., and Malone, J.,

dissent in a memorandum by Saxe, J.P., as follows: I would affirm the IAS court; the venue of this *127personal injury action should remain in the county selected by plaintiff, the only county where the moving defendant corporation operates its business, where, according to the biennial statement it filed with the New York Department of State, its principal executive office is located, and where the real property on which the accident occurred is located.

Plaintiff Peter Díscolo alleges that he slipped and fell on a substance which had been applied to his vehicle by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manchester Technologies, Inc. v. HansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Weiss v. Saks Fifth AvenueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Hill v. Delta International Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Velasquez v. Delaware River Valley Lease Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API