Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Booth

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1969No. 6918SC445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

Plaintiff contends that she had the right of way at the intersection because she was traveling on the dominant street (Willow Road). She contends that the stop sign, having been erected, designated Willow Road as the dominant street and Tuscaloosa Street as the servient street; and that her rights were not changed merely because the stop sign was not in place at the time of the collision. She relies upon Kelly v. Ashburn, 256 N.C. 338, 123 S.E. 2d 775.

Defendant Booth contends that he was not confronted with a stop sign; that there is no evidence that he knew of the previously existing stop…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. SchafferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Tucker v. MoorefieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Kelly v. AshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Hardy Ex Rel. Adams v. TeshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cucina v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Dawson v. JennetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Hathcock v. LowderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API