Legal Opinion

Howard v. United States

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1978PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Chief Justice.

In this action of interpleader, the principal inquiry is whether the income from a spendthrift trust is subject to a lien for the payment of federal taxes.

The last will and testament of Laurence B. Howard established a residuary trust with his two sons, Laurence B. Howard, Jr. and William Felder Howard, designated as income beneficiaries, with income payable quarterly during their respective lives, and with the trust being terminated upon the death of the survivor. Item VI(m) reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

[Njeither the principal nor the income of the trust…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. Estate of DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. American City Bank of Tullahoma v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  2. Southern Bank of Lauderdale County v. Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Limor v. Fleet Mortgage GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Edmondson Management Service, Inc. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stratton v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API