Hopkins v. Hopkins
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
This was a libel similar to the preceding. The adultery ivas alleged to have been committed at Homer, in the state of New York, and that appeared to have been the settled place of abode oi "the parties at the time. The libellant has since removed into this county.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
I consider this point as settled by the decision in the case of Richardson vs. Richardson (1). That determination ivas made upon sufficient deliberation. There certainly is no inducement to increase the facility of procuring divorces. I am for dismissing the libel.
2 Mass. Rep. 153.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richardson v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sewall v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Bradshaw v. HeathNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Pawling v. WillsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Kapigian v. Der MinassianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Harding v. AldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1832
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.