Legal Opinion

Glaxo Group Ltd. v. Leavitt

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 6, 2007No. Civil AMD 06-469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DAVIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Glaxo Group, Ltd., sought and obtained a temporary restraining order (TRO), which was secured by a $3 million bond, enjoining the effectiveness of the approval by the Food and Drug Administration of an application by intervening defendant Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (Rox-ane), to market fluticasone propionate, the generic form of Glaxo’s patented Flonase, the patent for which had expired. Subsequently, after a hearing, I denied Glaxo’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Now pending is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenwood County v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. Pargas, Inc. v. Empire Gas Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976
  3. Network International L.C. v. Worldcom Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GLAXO GROUP LTD. v. LeavittDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  2. Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC v. CurryDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API