Legal Opinion

unempl.ins.rep. Cch 21,737 in Re Philip E. Brown, Formerly Dba J & B Produce Co., a Co-Partnership, Debtor. Philip E. Brown v. State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1984No. 17-55856PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

The Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California granted an injunction against California’s assessment of unemployment taxes, disability taxes, and personal income withholding taxes against Philip E. Brown measured by the compensation he paid to certain truck drivers. The bankruptcy court’s order was based on a finding that the drivers were independent contractors and not Brown’s employees, and thus, Brown was not liable for the taxes. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court. Applying a de novo standard of review to undisputed facts, we conclude…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Bonnette v. California Health And Welfare AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. VECTOR MARKETING CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Robinson v. City of San Bernardino Police DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  3. United States v. HaynesworthDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
  4. In Re SLUGGO’S CHICAGO STYLE, INC., Debtor. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Appellant, v. Harold S. TAXEL, Trustee, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API